0189名無しさん＠ピンキー2010/11/14(日) 08:41:20ID:d4zCZ7TiO
Jimさん
へるす板の、本番行為助長のレスについては一律削除ですか？
どういった方向で考えられてますか？
待ってる人が沢山います。
申し訳ありませんが、英語が分からないので、日本語でお答え頂けたら助かります。
JIMさん
お水出会い系の板はレス削除人不在ですか？
かなり削除要請ありますが放置状態です
0191名無しさん＠ピンキー2010/11/18(木) 07:30:17ID:Vv05U7nh0
There are considerably many voices to expect the deletion work start of the reply of the contribution to promote the public performance act of the thread of Jim さんへるす (reply deletion), but does think in a direction done how?
0192Primavera ◆FLOWERqR32 2011/05/30(月) 21:04:48.62ID:eR+p25X40
0193jim ◆IamTAAl4HA 2011/05/30(月) 21:31:41.71ID:FCadFacm0
>>192
This court does not have jurisdiction over the Pink Channel servers.
That would have to be done in Carson City Nevada, or maybe San Francisco California.
I see my name, and many old posts on archive servers.
This person has taken a lot of time and effort to do this. Did they ever
ask for a deletion request on our boards, and if they did it might not have been
justified since it is about an actress who is at least B level.
If it is justifiable for deletion, then we can delete, but that court order is not
0194Primavera ◆FLOWERqR32 2011/05/30(月) 22:21:59.39ID:eR+p25X40
I knew that the interim order was outside for you.
However, in future, may I report similar order to you?
Thank you.
>>193
Yes please do. thank you for reporting this. Getting interim order is one of the ways at 2ch for requesting deletion officially.
You had better keep in mind that this might be taken for a proof the
lawyer requested for deletion officially and you did not delete them
within reasonable period of time when they will do official lawsuit at
NV/SF later date. (Not following BBS's official way for requesting
deletion does not matter.)
0197jim ◆IamTAAl4HA 2011/05/31(火) 09:45:28.29ID:Gk+39F370
>>196
I know this might sound offensive, but what happens in Japan does not
matter. This court order actually has no affect, those posts from 2002 and 2003
are valid, and do not need to be deleted. >>198
Please paraphrase for me? I understand the date stamp, and the fact that it is 8 years to late to complain. >>197
Well, although Japanese court order may not have any effect to you,
the fact remains that you now know the requests were made and ignored.
That may be used for unfavorable proof at official trial in the U.S.
against you. I'm not blackmailing to you or anything, just suggestion
since the lawyer seemed to be serious like doing 300,000 yen deposition
getting the interim order. >>201
Thank you for paraphrasing for me.
>>200
Lawyers can often be very expensive, and very often the return for the investment in their time does not give you a return. >>202
Since Japanese court admitted they are worth deleting,
U.S. court may also rule the same and the fact you refused
makes you liable for restitution. I just wondered why
you are going to take such a risk (not deleting) If you
talked with your lawyer about this and got your relief,
I won't say anything anymore though. 0205名無しさん＠ピンキー2011/06/08(水) 12:12:45.46ID:xHN9nHzDO
『特定電気通信役務提供者の損害賠償責任の制限及び発信者情報の開示に関する法律』に基づき発信者情報の開示を求めたく、どこにご連絡・ご依頼をしていいのか和訳にてご教示願います。
0207名無しさん＠ピンキー2011/06/08(水) 12:20:43.67ID:xHN9nHzDO
>>206
意味がよくわかりません
ネット用語ではなく、正しい日本語で教えてください >>207
その外国人はまるで母国語のように日本語を話した。 0209真田2011/06/10(金) 12:38:28.18ID:YSKin6gSO
>>208
おっしゃることはわかりました。
アメリカがネットに対して緩やかなのは、基本的人権を巨大な権力から守り、その対抗処置として、ネットの力を認めてます。
中国に対して、アメリカが激しく批判を展開したのも、そういう背景からだと思います。
今回の件は、カキコミそのものもさることながら、彼等とバトルした私に大きな責任があり大変申し訳なく思いますが、その自由さが自分より弱い立場の侵害に向けられるべきではないと思います。
私の案件以外にも多数の削除依頼が寄せられており、順次処理されるのを待つしかないとは、思います。
しかし、今後の教訓として、ハンドルネームの付与や登録はフェイスブックとか、カキコミの本人責任の制約条件を講じることを検討すべきではないでしょうか？
削除については、粛々と待ち、煽られてもスレッドへのカキコミも控えます。
連投は止めます。
長々とすいませんでした。 レンジャーが道を拓く。君は常軌を逸しているよ。打ち挙げます。挙る微妙な情勢です。
彼は何らかの解決策を提案しましたか。問題の解決策を考え出す。
0211(＾-＾) ◆witch2estc 2011/06/28(火) 05:24:59.47ID:2/H3mmvh0
I am hard to use a new deletion system very much.
I want I contact Itadaki-san and to make a conventional thing.
>>211
Good morning Witch-san. What we have is currently the result of input from volunteers. Please make your suggestions for it. We can't go backwards, we can only go forwards.
0213(＾-＾) ◆witch2estc 2011/06/28(火) 23:51:28.14ID:2/H3mmvh0
I illustrated it.
May I transmit png Image?
>>213
Please email the photo here.
pic@emailgenki.com
Then we can all look at it. Topic@emailgenki.com
日付2011年6月29日9:50
>>215
That file is not found. Please send to pic@emailgenki.com
There is no topic@emailgenki.com email. Hi Witch-san, how are you today?
Hello.
I transmitted an email again last night.
pic@emailgenki.com ＆ jin@bbsp‥‥
Hi Witch-san
That is not my email. It is an automatic email for uploading photos.
You did cc my personal email address. Why don't you put that link here?
However I already looked at it, and it looks like the old system that caused us much trouble and heartache a few months ago. We won't go back to that system.
If you have so ideas from it we can discuss on the deleter thread and if others are
interested we have engineers assigned to Pink channel that can make changes.
We have been doing that for several months and there have been many changes and tests.
>>221
Yes, that resembled old system.
Cannot you lock it with pink about the trouble?
I want the system which can work in a click than copy & paste.
Because it was the details about the system, I did not write it here.
I did not know that I was shown by the transmission of the image.
Because >>216 did not arrive at Jim-san., I used CC.
Because I am going to take a rest from tomorrow, I end the talk. 官僚は旧法規の改正に関して、成り行きを見守っています。
>>224
show running-config 0226Primavera ◆FLOWERqR32 2012/04/22(日) 21:34:22.48ID:lHqeNG4h0
We encountered to one deletion problem.
The megami board has "no redistribution" in local rule.
In the deletion about that rule, first picture URL was deleted
as the cause of the redistribution along with the deletion of redistributed URL.
I think I want to ask you an opinion about whether or not to
preserve first picture URL even if there is redistribution's danger.
>>226
When in doubt deletion is better. 0228 ◆JACK/GoIHM 2012/04/23(月) 12:33:12.46ID:YVNVtXZK0
>>227
Is that about all the deletion matters?
Or is it only about the important deletion matter? >>228
I think I made some confusion. Sorry about that.
For normal deletion matters, not deleting if you are uncertain.
For important deletion matters, please delete if doubtful. 重点削除
0230 ◆JACK/GoIHM 2012/04/23(月) 14:15:51.73ID:YVNVtXZK0
>>229
Thank you for your reply.
I understood these. Again, I am sorry for any misunderstanding.
0232名無しさん＠ピンキー2012/04/23(月) 18:17:36.87ID:xFgQz3v8O
>>228
何故 重点削除だけを質問するのですか？ 0233名無しさん＠ピンキー2012/04/23(月) 18:51:46.42ID:PE/Q+ZrZ0
226 名前：Primavera ◆FLOWERqR32 投稿日：2012/04/22(日) 21:34:22.48 ID:lHqeNG4h0
削除に関するところで揉めています。
女神板はLRで「転載禁止」となっています。
それに準拠して、元画像のURLを転載の原因となっているとして削除しました。
例え転載の原因となっても、元画像のURLを保存すべきかお尋ねします。
227 名前：jim ◆IamTAAl4HA 投稿日：2012/04/22(日) 22:29:03.34 ID:69xkOv1M0
>>226
怪しいから削除したほうが良いと思うならね。
228 名前： ◆JACK/GoIHM 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 12:33:12.46 ID:YVNVtXZK0
>>227
全ての削除対象について言ってるんですか？
それとも重点削除対象について言ってるんですか。
229 名前：自夢 ◆IamTAAl4HA 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 13:55:58.62 ID:wLZ66RL/0
>>228
取り乱したようだ。すまない。
通常削除対象については、迷ったら削除しないで良い。
だがしかし、重点削除対象については怪しいと思ったら削除してくれ。
230 名前： ◆JACK/GoIHM 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 14:15:51.73 ID:YVNVtXZK0
>>229
ご回答ありがとうございます。
理解しました。
231 名前：自夢 ◆IamTAAl4HA 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 15:25:47.03 ID:c/b45mUN0
ああ、誤解して本当に申し訳なかった。 0234 ◆JACK/GoIHM 2012/04/23(月) 20:10:50.38ID:hULTaITh0
>>234
Yes, that is a good idea. 0239名無しさん＠ピンキー2021/12/23(木) 19:45:56.99ID:/Mhh5I2G0