Let's talk with Jim-san.on HK.
■ このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています
housekeepingでの問題を管理人のJimさんとお話しするスレです。
関連スレ
Let's talk with Jim-san. Part13
http://set.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1238806339/l50 Can I delete a thread only in the thread title?
This is the title of the thread.
"Rape scene of a primary school student,
Sperm have a scene in the vagina of elementary school students, And gang rape etc.. part2."
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/hneta/1227705496/l50
スレッドのタイトルだけでスレッドを削除していいのですか？
スレッドのタイトルはこれです。
「小学校の学生をレイプする場面、
小学校の学生の膣の中に精子を出している場面、輪姦など。part2。」 >>2
I looked at that thread, and I don't think it is really what the thread says.
There are no links to pictures. Don't delete it. ここは野次馬や通りすがりも参加可能な議論スレという認識で良いのかしら？
それとも削除人が問題提起して管理人が答えるスレ？ >>3
Additional explanation to >>4 for Jim-san
Those deleted links(>>4) contained direct U12 child pornography
jpg & movie links, and infos where all those jpg & movie a person
can get. Sato-san is asking that if he could delete the thread after
those repeated offense. I understand now.
When I click on the links, I only get this though.
http://www.rentalcgi.com/err.htm
The 404 page for rentalcgi.com
Yes lets delete the thread. I deleted the thread now. Hi, Jim-san.
I haven't seen you for a long time.
There are a lot of things which "a primary schoolchild / a junior high student / a high school student" is included in in a thread title elsewhere.
example.
thread title
The movie of the high school student of the girl.
This is the movie which served a girl of a high school student a sleeping drug.
And man is doing an indecent act.
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1198838350/437
It is the second over there. スレタイのみでスレッド削除は問題ありですが、
消しても消しても的な進行であれば、削除人さんの独自の判断でスレ削除はOKかと思うです。 >>11
I can't see the movie from here.
There are to many threads like that to delete them.
When there is a deletion request, it should be deleted.
When a board or BBS is moderated, then the moderator takes responsibility.
bbspink is to big to moderate. It is impossible to see all the posts that are posted daily.
So it is Unmoderated, not moderated.
If someone posts a deletion request, then it becomes necessary to check into it.
Example: Mr. Smith decides to search through a bbs and become its moderator.
He finds many things that are objectionable to him. Since Mr. Smith is a deletion volunteer
he is actively looking for things to delete. This makes him a moderator. It is an act of taking
responsibility.
Here is another example of things that happen sometimes.
Mr. Brown does not like Mr. Smith, so Mr. Brown reports Mr. Smith posts as objectionable.
Then he requests that they be deleted. This silences Mr. Smith if they are deleted.
The only thing wrong with Mr. Smith posts was that Mr. Brown did not like Mr. Smith.
We have to use our thinking caps to make sure we don't delete this type of material Only reported posts should be deleted, and the deleter should be able to understand the reason for the deletion. If he does not, then the post should not be deleted. >>12
Big Tits！
No！！ No！！！ No！！！！！ (・＿・、) It is cache to worry in the confirmation work.
Deleter is troubled.
① It is necessary for deleter to watch an allied future image.
② Deleter does not need to watch an image of the link future.
①or②？ ■ このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています
