Let's talk with Jim-san.on HK.
■ このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています
housekeepingでの問題を管理人のJimさんとお話しするスレです。
関連スレ
Let's talk with Jim-san. Part13
http://set.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1238806339/l50 Can I delete a thread only in the thread title?
This is the title of the thread.
"Rape scene of a primary school student,
Sperm have a scene in the vagina of elementary school students, And gang rape etc.. part2."
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/hneta/1227705496/l50
スレッドのタイトルだけでスレッドを削除していいのですか？
スレッドのタイトルはこれです。
「小学校の学生をレイプする場面、
小学校の学生の膣の中に精子を出している場面、輪姦など。part2。」 >>2
I looked at that thread, and I don't think it is really what the thread says.
There are no links to pictures. Don't delete it. ここは野次馬や通りすがりも参加可能な議論スレという認識で良いのかしら？
それとも削除人が問題提起して管理人が答えるスレ？ >>3
Additional explanation to >>4 for Jim-san
Those deleted links(>>4) contained direct U12 child pornography
jpg & movie links, and infos where all those jpg & movie a person
can get. Sato-san is asking that if he could delete the thread after
those repeated offense. I understand now.
When I click on the links, I only get this though.
http://www.rentalcgi.com/err.htm
The 404 page for rentalcgi.com
Yes lets delete the thread. I deleted the thread now. Hi, Jim-san.
I haven't seen you for a long time.
There are a lot of things which "a primary schoolchild / a junior high student / a high school student" is included in in a thread title elsewhere.
example.
thread title
The movie of the high school student of the girl.
This is the movie which served a girl of a high school student a sleeping drug.
And man is doing an indecent act.
http://venus.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/ascii/1198838350/437
It is the second over there. スレタイのみでスレッド削除は問題ありですが、
消しても消しても的な進行であれば、削除人さんの独自の判断でスレ削除はOKかと思うです。 >>11
I can't see the movie from here.
There are to many threads like that to delete them.
When there is a deletion request, it should be deleted.
When a board or BBS is moderated, then the moderator takes responsibility.
bbspink is to big to moderate. It is impossible to see all the posts that are posted daily.
So it is Unmoderated, not moderated.
If someone posts a deletion request, then it becomes necessary to check into it.
Example: Mr. Smith decides to search through a bbs and become its moderator.
He finds many things that are objectionable to him. Since Mr. Smith is a deletion volunteer
he is actively looking for things to delete. This makes him a moderator. It is an act of taking
responsibility.
Here is another example of things that happen sometimes.
Mr. Brown does not like Mr. Smith, so Mr. Brown reports Mr. Smith posts as objectionable.
Then he requests that they be deleted. This silences Mr. Smith if they are deleted.
The only thing wrong with Mr. Smith posts was that Mr. Brown did not like Mr. Smith.
We have to use our thinking caps to make sure we don't delete this type of material Only reported posts should be deleted, and the deleter should be able to understand the reason for the deletion. If he does not, then the post should not be deleted. >>12
Big Tits！
No！！ No！！！ No！！！！！ (・＿・、) It is cache to worry in the confirmation work.
Deleter is troubled.
① It is necessary for deleter to watch an allied future image.
② Deleter does not need to watch an image of the link future.
①or②？ >>20
You are correct sir. >>18 one more again.
It is cache to worry in the confirmation work.
Deleter is troubled.
1 It is necessary for deleter to watch an allied future image.
2 Deleter does not need to watch an image of the link future.
1 or 2 ? >>24 is
There are many people interfering with deletion work in this thread.
What will you do with interfering people?
What should we do?
■ Child pornography report and delete. ■
http://babiru.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1237412916 The demand for Mr. Jim is OK? here.
Could you increase those who delete it more?
The matter stagnates now though it is not understood how many those who delete it exist.
When it is not possible to translate well, I'm sorry. example.
http://babiru.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1237412916/382
http://babiru.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1237412916/384
These are unrelated reports.
These are so malicious harassment.
It is complained that I delete it without watching this.
"Why did you delete it.
It isn't child pornography."
However, I do not want to look.
Should we delete all the reported things? - of in a Child pornography thread.
>>28 is
Please increase deleter people more.
The reason is because work of the deletion is delayed. ジムさん、こんばんわ
問題です
↓の写真はポルノですか？アメリカのサーバーで公開されているようます
あうと？せーふ？
SEXUAL MATURATION OF EARLY-MATURING GIRL AT SEMIANNUAL INTERVALS FROM AGE 9.0-14.0.
ttp://visibletime.ararchive.com/_Adolescent_Period02_.jpg >>29
Don't worry, if it was really important, they will post it again
>32
Thank you.
I delete on all request thread of child porno it entirely. >>33
It is good. Thank you for your good work. >>31
とりあえず掘ってもらった、その後はどうするの？
こちらからの要望とかは？1レスでも規制？PINKのみ？2ch含めて全規制？ 2chさん含めては不可能と思います、特に今回の場合。
2ちゃんねるさんの重要削除の中に
> 目的に関わらず、児童ポルノの入手に関わる書き込みは一律削除します。
がありません。
ここからは「困る人」Jimさんでしょうか Jim-san.
http://qb5.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/sec2chd/1240346207/39
They are the people who violated a guideline-8.
They talk about the acquisition of the child pornography.
It is an important post delete object.
When it is usual.
When the same person contributes it many times, it is limited a note.
ARASHI.
But, there is little the number of times this time.
However, a problem is big.
Jim-san talk with FOX-san and would decide? 「jimとfoxが話をして決めてください。」 か。
これで本当に決まったら、大笑い、かな。 ISPへの報告だけにして規制発動は待ったしてほしひ
巻き込まれるのはいやづら これは面白いねえ。
URLの中身が児ポかそうじゃないかどうか判断するプロセスが確立しないままに、
規制が発動し得るかも知れない話なわけで。
事と次第によっては、本格的にBBSPINKから撤退かな。その準備はできてるし。 >>40
じゃあこれ以降は気にせずしっかり撤退してください。
つか、余計な発言は止めておいたほうがｗ
以下、報告
http://babiru.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1240182945/40 2009/04/24 23:16:15 ID:nxsleKUd0 ほんとほんと、触らぬ神に祟り無しですなあ。
要らんとばっちりはごめんですよｗ 自分からの報告はしっかり( ﾟдﾟ )るけどね、ついでのおまけで通報もしてるし。 >>37
I will talk to Fox-san soon. Good morning.
This is my personal opinion.
I think that ［nttcgi046176.tcgi.nt.adsl.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp］ and ［33.182.183.58.megaegg.ne.jp］ and
●[FhtN8KO/nxmOv1kg] had better regulate it.
Because the reason is because they talk about the acquisition of the child pornography mainly. ■ このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています
